How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | A rotating council of 24 former participants sets agendas; assemblies of about 30 lottery-selected residents deliberate and aim for consensus on recommendations.Sortition / citizens' assembly | On-chain proposals and token-weighted votes. | The Prime Minister is formally responsible for Diella; the Constitutional Court states AI cannot change who exercises public power or bears accountability. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Professional moderation; quotas for age, gender, residence and socio-economic background; recommendations are addressed to parliament and government. | Wyoming law via the LLC wrapper. | Opposition challenged the decrees before the Constitutional Court, which dismissed the request on 8 October 2026; its full reasoning is pending. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Own annual parliamentary budget and a permanent staff member inside the parliament administration. | Unknown | Aims to improve public-service access and reduce discretion in public procurement. | |
| How is AI used? | No AI role. | No documented AI role. | Chatbot and voice assistant on e-Albania; a procurement system tender was still being prepared in August 2026. | |
| What are the main risks? | Uptake depends on political willingness; voluntary participation after the draw; small population and limited scope. | Low participation; token concentration; regulatory uncertainty. | Unclear accountability for an AI 'minister'; no AI law yet; no published technical detail; AKSHI's leaders face a tender-rigging case.CLM-0359 |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.