Polity Atlas
DisputedSource attached · not independently reviewedCLM-0206 · as of 2026-10-23 · about: Constitutionalism · Author: Polity Atlas editorial team

“Whether strong judicial review of legislation is democratically legitimate is disputed: defenders see it as protecting rights from majorities, while critics such as Ran Hirschl describe a transfer of power from elected bodies to courts.”

Context. Positions differ by country, court design and the kind of right at stake.

Evidence that supports

1

Evidence that contradicts

0

No counter-evidence recorded.

Context

Constitutionalism

Status history

No earlier revisions.

Disputes

No disputes have been filed.

Dispute or add evidence

Submissions are reviewed by an editor and logged publicly on this claim. A source is required.

Your evidence
Not signed in — leave an email so an editor can follow up.