Polity Atlas

قاعدة تقييم الأثر الخوارزمي

قاعدة للقطاع العام بشأن القرارات الآلية: التسجيل والتقييم المسبق والمراجعة البشرية والطعن والتدقيق المستقل.

مكوّن · charterرخصة مفتوحة · CC BY-SA 4.0ليس قالبًا قانونيًا
تفريعاستخدم في Polity Lab
مقارنة
+7 · −5
11 # Algorithmic impact assessment rule
22
3−1. Register. {public body} keeps a public register of every automated system used to make or support decisions about individuals: purpose, owner, supplier, data used, deployment date.
4−2. Assessment. Before deployment the owner publishes an assessment of purpose, affected groups, risks of error and bias, and alternatives considered.
5−3. Notice. Affected people are told when an automated system was used and are given a plain-language explanation of the main factors.
3+1. Register. {public body} publishes a register of each automated decision system: purpose, owner, supplier, data, deployment date and latest assessment.
4+2. Assessment. Owners publish an assessment before deployment and again after any material change.
5+3. Notice and explanation. Affected people are told an automated system was used and receive a plain-language explanation.
66 4. Human review. A named official with authority to override reviews every decision that {consequential criteria}.
7−5. Appeal. Any person affected may ask for human reconsideration within {number} days and receives a reasoned answer within {number} days.
8−6. Logs. Decision logs are kept for {retention period}.
7+5. Appeal. Reconsideration by a human within {number} days; reasoned answer within {number} days.
8+6. Audit. {independent body} audits each system every {audit period}, with access to models, data and logs.
9+7. Suspension. The system is suspended when {suspension trigger} and stays suspended until {reinstatement condition}.
10+8. Excluded uses. {list of uses not permitted}.
اقترح تعديلًا